Attendees
Joan Salome-Rodriguez (Facilitator), Katia Kelly, Louis Kleinman, Susan Yung, Erica Eliason.
Guests: Terri Thomson, Aaron Kaufman, Corinne Brenner
The Committee discussed the following questions and decided which answers from Victoria Sacks (EPA Remedial Project Manager) needed follow-up (I will be drafting a follow-up for Victoria, Erica will put it on a Google Doc for editing by the committee):
1) What will go in the gap between the old and new bulkheads on the Whole Foods site?
A minimum one-foot layer of AquaBlok will be placed in the gap, followed by gravel to existing grade. For structural stability, the new bulkhead support system requires tieback anchors to be drilled through the face of the wall.
Per Aaron Kaufman: AquaBlok goes down at the bottom of where the old bulkhead meets the new bulkhead. The gravel goes up to the level of the parking lot. The tieback attaches to the new bulkhead and through the old one and deep into the soil (up to 50 feet deep) and the soil holds it in place. This type of tieback is an industry-accepted standard and has been used elsewhere (in answer to Louis’s question).
2) Was the Whole Foods site footprint remediated when it was built?
The Whole Foods property is in NYSDEC’s Brownfield Cleanup Program and was remediated in approximately 2013. EPA was satisfied with the remedy at that time. Please refer to the NYSDEC Brownfield Cleanup Program website for further details.
Although the answer to this question was yes, see the answer to # 3 below – not so reassuring.
3) Can the new bulkhead be perforated?
Perforations have been made solely to extend existing outfalls. Otherwise, these bulkheads are typically required to be sealed without perforations as a backup cleanup measure in case there was undetected residual subsurface contamination present.
Read more »



